Atom D425 vs i5-13400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking485not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency21.26no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$993

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm45 nm
Die size257 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel GMA 3150
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Atom D425.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23192
+11269%
Atom D425 204

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 21 June 2010
Physical cores 10 1
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

i5-13400 has an age advantage of 12 years, and 900% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Atom D425, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400 and Atom D425. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Atom D425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1076 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.