Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i5-11400H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-11400H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
10.13
+45.1%

i5-11400H outperforms i7-1195G7 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking727965
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTiger LakeTiger Lake
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Tiger Lake-UP3
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache480 KB320 KB
L2 cache7.5 MB5 MB
L3 cache12 MB12 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1787BGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-11400H 10.13
+45.1%
i7-1195G7 6.98

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-11400H 15664
+45.1%
i7-1195G7 10798

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 45% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i5-11400H 1821
i7-1195G7 1843
+1.2%

Core i7-1195G7 outperforms Core i5-11400H by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i5-11400H 6366
+20%
i7-1195G7 5304

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-11400H 12043
+20.6%
i7-1195G7 9989

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 21% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-11400H 6.8
+20.1%
i7-1195G7 8.17

Core i7-1195G7 outperforms Core i5-11400H by 20% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-11400H 15
+38.2%
i7-1195G7 11

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 38% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-11400H 1277
+35.9%
i7-1195G7 940

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 36% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-11400H 218
i7-1195G7 222
+1.8%

Core i7-1195G7 outperforms Core i5-11400H by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-11400H 2.5
i7-1195G7 2.7
+8%

Core i7-1195G7 outperforms Core i5-11400H by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-11400H 8.2
+27.3%
i7-1195G7 6.4

Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-1195G7 by 27% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i5-11400H 5571
i7-1195G7 6334
+13.7%

Core i7-1195G7 outperforms Core i5-11400H by 14% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.13 6.98
Integrated graphics card 2.29 9.43
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

i5-11400H has a 45.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i7-1195G7, on the other hand, has 311.8% faster integrated GPU, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-11400H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-1195G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11400H and Core i7-1195G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-11400H
Core i5-11400H
Intel Core i7-1195G7
Core i7-1195G7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3307 votes

Rate Core i5-11400H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 188 votes

Rate Core i7-1195G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-11400H or Core i7-1195G7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.