EPYC 4124P vs i5-11400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-11400F
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.71
EPYC 4124P
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
11.73
+9.5%

EPYC 4124P outperforms Core i5-11400F by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking732667
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.2852.71
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency15.5917.08
Architecture codenameRocket Lake (2021)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$157$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4124P has 34% better value for money than i5-11400F.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size276 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-11400F 10.71
EPYC 4124P 11.73
+9.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-11400F 17005
EPYC 4124P 18637
+9.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 11.73
Recency 16 March 2021 21 May 2024
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

i5-11400F has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

EPYC 4124P, on the other hand, has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P.

Note that Core i5-11400F is a desktop processor while EPYC 4124P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11400F and EPYC 4124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F
AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8820 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-11400F or EPYC 4124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.