Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Core i5-10400F
Aggregate performance score
i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 852 | 1259 |
| Place by popularity | 12 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 41.74 | 14.17 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Zen+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | 20 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | no data |
| Current price | $109 (0.7x MSRP) | $132 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-10400F has 195% better value for money than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA1200 | Socket AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by 86% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.42 | 4.52 |
| Recency | 20 May 2020 | 30 September 2019 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
i5-10400F has a 86.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
