Ryzen 7 4800H vs i5-1035G1

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-1035G1
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.62
Ryzen 7 4800H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
11.62
+152%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Core i5-1035G1 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1297673
Place by popularity8790
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency17.4824.42
Architecture codenameIce Lake (Client) (2019)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date1 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$297no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 × 4 GT/sno data
Multiplier1029
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1526FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.732 GB/s68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-1035G1 4.62
Ryzen 7 4800H 11.62
+152%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-1035G1 7343
Ryzen 7 4800H 18464
+151%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-1035G1 6870
+20.9%
Ryzen 7 4800H 5684

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-1035G1 21299
Ryzen 7 4800H 37276
+75%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-1035G1 10.8
Ryzen 7 4800H 3.38
+220%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-1035G1 6
Ryzen 7 4800H 21
+263%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-1035G1 606
Ryzen 7 4800H 1854
+206%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-1035G1 168
Ryzen 7 4800H 188
+12.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-1035G1 1.97
Ryzen 7 4800H 2.18
+10.7%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-1035G1 4.2
Ryzen 7 4800H 10.3
+145%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-1035G1 3800
Ryzen 7 4800H 4601
+21.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-1035G1 3858
Ryzen 7 4800H 7955
+106%

Blender(-)

i5-1035G1 863
+229%
Ryzen 7 4800H 262

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-1035G1 1219
+2.4%
Ryzen 7 4800H 1191

7-Zip Single

i5-1035G1 4159
Ryzen 7 4800H 4686
+12.7%

7-Zip

i5-1035G1 15156
Ryzen 7 4800H 50075
+230%

WebXPRT 3

i5-1035G1 178
Ryzen 7 4800H 219
+22.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.62 11.62
Integrated graphics card 5.58 7.47
Recency 1 August 2019 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

i5-1035G1 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 4800H, on the other hand, has a 151.5% higher aggregate performance score, 33.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 4800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1035G1 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1035G1 and Ryzen 7 4800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-1035G1
Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2915 votes

Rate Core i5-1035G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3368 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-1035G1 or Ryzen 7 4800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.