Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs i3-N300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.35
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.38
+187%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U outperforms Core i3-N300 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1178454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency72.3351.98
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed0.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP7
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes920

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-N300 5.35
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 15.38
+187%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-N300 8497
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 24431
+188%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.35 15.38
Integrated graphics card 3.29 18.32
Recency 3 January 2023 16 April 2024
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

i3-N300 has 300% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, on the other hand, has a 187.5% higher aggregate performance score, 456.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-N300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-N300 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 78 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-N300 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.