Celeron G3930 vs Core i3-8100
Aggregate performance score
i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3930 by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1387 | 2112 |
| Place by popularity | 76 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.20 | 0.72 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 24 September 2017 (6 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-8100 has 622% better value for money than Celeron G3930.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1151 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3930 by 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3930 by 172% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3930 by 106% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3930 by 230% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.95 | 1.45 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 1.84 |
| Recency | 24 September 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
i3-8100 has a 172.4% higher aggregate performance score, 67.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron G3930, on the other hand, has 27.5% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8100 and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
