Celeron E3200 vs i3-8100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-8100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.84
+625%
Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53

Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron E3200 by a whopping 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14562853
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.162.88
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency5.860.77
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date5 October 2017 (7 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-8100 has 44% better value for money than Celeron E3200.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size126 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-8100 3.84
+625%
Celeron E3200 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-8100 6101
+627%
Celeron E3200 839

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.84 0.53
Recency 5 October 2017 30 August 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

i3-8100 has a 624.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8100 and Celeron E3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8100
Core i3-8100
Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2295 votes

Rate Core i3-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 75 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8100 or Celeron E3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.