Xeon Gold 5320H vs i3-7360X
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 277 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.60 |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 3 October 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 27.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | 2066 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 October 2017 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 150 Watt |
i3-7360X has 33.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5320H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-7360X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7360X and Xeon Gold 5320H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
