Ryzen 3 7440U vs i3-7360X
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 930 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.65 |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) |
| Release date | 3 October 2017 (7 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 137 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 October 2017 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 112 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 3 7440U has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-7360X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7440U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7360X and Ryzen 3 7440U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
