Xeon E5620 vs i3-7300T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7300T
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.65
+17.3%
Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.26

Core i3-7300T outperforms Xeon E5620 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17231826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.670.08
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency7.132.66
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-7300T has 738% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °C78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7300T 2.65
+17.3%
Xeon E5620 2.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7300T 4211
+17.2%
Xeon E5620 3592

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-7300T 1108
+202%
Xeon E5620 367

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-7300T 2363
+61%
Xeon E5620 1468

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 2.26
Recency 3 January 2017 16 March 2010
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

i3-7300T has a 17.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5620, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i3-7300T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5620 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-7300T is a desktop processor while Xeon E5620 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7300T and Xeon E5620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7300T
Core i3-7300T
Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Core i3-7300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 128 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7300T or Xeon E5620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.