Pro A6-8500B vs i3-7102E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.64
+62.4%
Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.01

Core i3-7102E outperforms Pro A6-8500B by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20862467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency6.186.34
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.64
+62.4%
Pro A6-8500B 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
+62.3%
Pro A6-8500B 1601

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 1.01
Recency 3 January 2017 3 June 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

i3-7102E has a 62.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A6-8500B, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7102E is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A6-8500B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Pro A6-8500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Pro A6-8500B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.