Apple M2 Max vs i3-7102E

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.64
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.78
+923%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core i3-7102E by a whopping 923% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2073385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.21no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Apple M-Series
Power efficiency6.2120.10
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)no data
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache512 KB36 MB
L3 cache3 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.64
Apple M2 Max 16.78
+923%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
Apple M2 Max 26658
+926%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 16.78
Recency 3 January 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 79 Watt

i3-7102E has 216% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 923.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-7102E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.