EPYC 4344P vs i3-6100E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09
EPYC 4344P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.53
+930%

EPYC 4344P outperforms Core i3-6100E by a whopping 930% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1892251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2452.16
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency5.6531.33
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4344P has 21633% better value for money than i3-6100E.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size98.57 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100E 2.09
EPYC 4344P 21.53
+930%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100E 3315
EPYC 4344P 34198
+932%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 21.53
Integrated graphics card 2.60 1.98
Recency 12 October 2015 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i3-6100E has 31.3% faster integrated GPU, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4344P, on the other hand, has a 930.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4344P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-6100E is a notebook processor while EPYC 4344P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100E and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100E or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.