A4-9120 vs i3-6100E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09
+171%
A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77

Core i3-6100E outperforms A4-9120 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100E and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18932654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.654.86
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100E and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size98.57 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100E and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataBGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100E and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100E and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100E and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100E and A4-9120.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100E 2.09
+171%
A4-9120 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100E 3315
+172%
A4-9120 1217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 0.77
Integrated graphics card 2.60 1.03
Recency 12 October 2015 1 June 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

i3-6100E has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, 152.4% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6100E is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100E and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E
AMD A4-9120
A4-9120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 503 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100E or A4-9120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.