Celeron 430 vs Core i3-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1636not rated
Place by popularity70not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size98.57 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data60 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket1151775
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-6100 4270
+1425%
Celeron 430 280

Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron 430 by 1425% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-6100 1200
+674%
Celeron 430 155

Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron 430 by 674% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-6100 2345
+1366%
Celeron 430 160

Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron 430 by 1366% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 35 Watt

i3-6100 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 430, on the other hand, has 45.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100 and Celeron 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100
Core i3-6100
Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1397 votes

Rate Core i3-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 135 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100 or Celeron 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.