Athlon X4 970 vs i3-560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-560
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.05
Athlon X4 970
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.66
+58.1%

Athlon X4 970 outperforms Core i3-560 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24332070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.362.42
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 August 2010 (14 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$190no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors382 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-560 1.05
Athlon X4 970 1.66
+58.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-560 1662
Athlon X4 970 2644
+59.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 1.66
Recency 29 August 2010 27 July 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon X4 970 has a 58.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-560 and Athlon X4 970, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-560
Core i3-560
AMD Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 970

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 82 votes

Rate Core i3-560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 118 votes

Rate Athlon X4 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-560 or Athlon X4 970, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.