E1-1200 vs i3-540

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-540
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.97
+304%
E1-1200
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.24

Core i3-540 outperforms E1-1200 by a whopping 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-540 and E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24973178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.251.26
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-540 and E1-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size81 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-540 and E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FT1
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-540 and E1-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-540 and E1-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-540 and E1-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-540 and E1-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 7310
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-540 and E1-1200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-540 and E1-1200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-540 0.97
+304%
E1-1200 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-540 1540
+305%
E1-1200 380

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-540 408
+334%
E1-1200 94

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-540 837
+413%
E1-1200 163

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 0.24
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.33
Recency 7 January 2010 6 June 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 18 Watt

i3-540 has a 304.2% higher aggregate performance score, 133.3% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E1-1200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 305.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-540 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1200 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-540 is a desktop processor while E1-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-540 and E1-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-540
Core i3-540
AMD E1-1200
E1-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 671 vote

Rate Core i3-540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 276 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-540 or E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.