A8-9600 vs Core i3-4370T
Aggregate performance score
i3-4370T outperforms A8-9600 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4370T and A8-9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1776 | 1793 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.28 | 14.13 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 January 2015 (9 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $78 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A8-9600 has 4946% better value for money than i3-4370T.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4370T and A8-9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 320K |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4370T and A8-9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4370T and A8-9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4370T and A8-9600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4370T and A8-9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R7 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4370T and A8-9600.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-4370T outperforms A8-9600 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-4370T outperforms A8-9600 by 2% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.17 | 2.14 |
| Recency | 1 January 2015 | 27 July 2017 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
i3-4370T has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
A8-9600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-4370T and A8-9600.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4370T and A8-9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
