Core i3-6100 vs Core i3-4370
Aggregate performance score
i3-6100 outperforms i3-4370 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1701 | 1645 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 70 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | 1.58 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 21 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $242 | $117 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-6100 has 1480% better value for money than i3-4370.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 98.57 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1150 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-4370 by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-4370 by 11% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-4370 outperforms Core i3-6100 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-4370 outperforms Core i3-6100 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.49 | 2.76 |
| Recency | 21 July 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 51 Watt |
i3-6100 has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4370 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4370 and Core i3-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
