FX-4170 vs Core i3-4150
Aggregate performance score
i3-4150 outperforms FX-4170 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4150 and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1764 | 1866 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 May 2014 (10 years ago) | 27 February 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Current price | $84 | $86 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-4150 and FX-4170 have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4150 and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4150 and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4150 and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4150 and FX-4170 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4150 and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4400 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4150 and FX-4170.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-4170 by 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-4170 by 12% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-4170 by 126% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-4170 by 70% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.19 | 1.96 |
| Recency | 1 May 2014 | 27 February 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 125 Watt |
i3-4150 has a 11.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 131.5% lower power consumption.
FX-4170, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
The Core i3-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4150 and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
