Ryzen 5 7520U vs i3-4100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4100M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.59
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.78
+264%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-4100M by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21081128
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency4.0536.28
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size130 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FP6
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4100M 1.59
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.78
+264%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4100M 2529
Ryzen 5 7520U 9188
+263%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4100M 759
Ryzen 5 7520U 1188
+56.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4100M 1527
Ryzen 5 7520U 3759
+146%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 5.78
Integrated graphics card 1.84 2.85
Recency 4 June 2013 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7520U has a 263.5% higher aggregate performance score, 54.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4100M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4100M and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4100M
Core i3-4100M
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Core i3-4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1494 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4100M or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.