Celeron M 560 vs i3-4100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4100M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.59
+368%
Celeron M 560
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.34

Core i3-4100M outperforms Celeron M 560 by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20993063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency4.071.07
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size130 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors960 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA946PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4100M 1.59
+368%
Celeron M 560 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4100M 2519
+371%
Celeron M 560 535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 0.34
Recency 4 June 2013 1 May 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 30 Watt

i3-4100M has a 367.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 560, on the other hand, has 23.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4100M and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4100M
Core i3-4100M
Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Core i3-4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4100M or Celeron M 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.