Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs i3-4010U

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4010U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.04
+247%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30

Core i3-4010U outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24293096
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency6.562.84
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$134

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4010U 1.04
+247%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4010U 1657
+244%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-4010U 2469
+97.5%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-4010U 5584
+135%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-4010U 2280
+128%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.30
Recency 4 June 2013 1 September 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

i3-4010U has a 246.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4010U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4010U and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4010U
Core i3-4010U
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 177 votes

Rate Core i3-4010U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4010U or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.