EPYC 7H12 vs i3-380UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed1.33 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1026
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1288TR4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380UM 745
EPYC 7H12 69633
+9247%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2010 18 September 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 280 Watt

i3-380UM has 1455.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-380UM is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380UM and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380UM or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.