Athlon MP 1600+ vs Core i3-380UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)K7 (2000−2003)
Release date1 October 2010 (13 years ago)15 October 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$210

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/s266 MT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die size81+114 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors382+177 Million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1288no data
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt62.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphicsno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2010 15 October 2001
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 62 Watt

i3-380UM has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 244.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-380UM is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380UM and Athlon MP 1600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM
AMD Athlon MP 1600+
Athlon MP 1600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380UM or Athlon MP 1600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.