FirePro A300 vs i3-370M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2673not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency1.97no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$245no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192K
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGAno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and FirePro A300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and FirePro A300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsFirePro
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and FirePro A300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and FirePro A300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2010 7 August 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i3-370M has 85.7% lower power consumption.

FirePro A300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-370M and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-370M is a notebook processor while FirePro A300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and FirePro A300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 507 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-370M or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.