Celeron 817 vs i3-370M
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2689 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 1.97 | no data |
Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 20 June 2010 (14 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $245 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 18 | 16 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA | no data |
Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | PGA988 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
FMA | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Celeron 817 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron 817.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 0.34 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
i3-370M has 126.5% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.
Celeron 817, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-370M and Celeron 817. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Celeron 817, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.