Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs i3-350M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.68
+209%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 81 Watt
0.22

Core i3-350M outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27293190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency1.830.26
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache128 KB128K
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size81+114 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGAno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.68
+209%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-350M 1087
+205%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 356

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.22
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 81 Watt

i3-350M has a 209.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 131.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-350M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 265 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.