Celeron 3205U vs i3-350M

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.68
+13.3%
Celeron 3205U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.60

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron 3205U by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27182795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.843.79
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130$107

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz800 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.68
+13.3%
Celeron 3205U 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-350M 1086
+14.7%
Celeron 3205U 947

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-350M 293
+9.3%
Celeron 3205U 268

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-350M 594
+23%
Celeron 3205U 483

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.60
Recency 7 January 2010 1 March 2015
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

i3-350M has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron 3205U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-350M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3205U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Celeron 3205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
Intel Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 264 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Celeron 3205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.