Celeron N5100 vs i3-330UM

Core i3-330M Core i3-350M Core i3-370M Core i3-380M Core i5-430M Core i5-460M Core i5-480M Core i5-520M Core i5-560M Core i7-620M Core i7-640M Pentium P6200
VS
Celeron N2830 Celeron N2840 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Celeron N3350 Celeron N4000 Celeron N4020 Celeron N4020C Celeron N4100 Celeron N4120 Celeron N4500 Celeron N5100

Contents

i3-330UM i3-330UM
Celeron N5100 Celeron N5100

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiencyno data32.81
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier9no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHz800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-330UM 555
Celeron N5100 3311
+497%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-330UM 189
Celeron N5100 434
+130%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-330UM 422
Celeron N5100 1078
+155%

Pros & cons summary

Recency 24 May 2010 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N5100 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330UM and Celeron N5100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
Intel Celeron N5100
Celeron N5100
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Atom Z650 Atom Z650
Celeron N5100 Celeron N5100
vs
i3-10110Y Core i3 10110Y
i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-87 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-87
i7-740QM Core i7 740QM
vs
Celeron 725C Celeron 725C
i7-740QM Core i7 740QM
vs
Pentium D 940 Pentium D 940
Pentium Dual T2390 Pentium Dual Core T2390
vs
Core 2 Duo T5870 Core 2 Duo T5870
Pentium Dual T2390 Pentium Dual Core T2390
vs
Core 2 Duo T6400 Core 2 Duo T6400
Athlon II X2 255 Athlon II X2 255
vs
Athlon X2 BE-2350 Athlon X2 BE-2350
i7-920 Core i7 920
vs
Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
A4-6300 A4 6300
vs
Celeron G1630 Celeron G1630
i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Celeron N4500 Celeron N4500
i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Celeron SU2300 Celeron SU2300
A4-6300 A4 6300
vs
Celeron E3300 Celeron E3300

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 383 votes

Rate Celeron N5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330UM or Celeron N5100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.