Atom Z670 vs i3-330UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
+250%
Atom Z670
2011
1 core / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.10

Core i3-330UM outperforms Atom Z670 by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30483368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.843.15
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)11 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0cDMI
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s400 MT/s
Multiplier98
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB2.93 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsPowerVR SGX535
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
LVDSno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330UM 0.35
+250%
Atom Z670 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-330UM 555
+251%
Atom Z670 158

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-330UM 1297
+161%
Atom Z670 497

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-330UM 2982
+293%
Atom Z670 759

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-330UM 42.73
+253%
Atom Z670 151

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-330UM 1
+345%
Atom Z670 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.10
Recency 24 May 2010 11 April 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 3 Watt

i3-330UM has a 250% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-330UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330UM and Atom Z670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330UM or Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.