Pentium Gold 7505 vs Core i3-330M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.66
Pentium Gold 7505
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.36
+409%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms i3-330M by a whopping 409% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26601518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Tiger Lake-U
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)17 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 (rPGA) -100 (BGA) °C100 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288, PGA988BGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMA++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330M 0.66
Pentium Gold 7505 3.36
+409%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 409% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-330M 1022
Pentium Gold 7505 5202
+409%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 409% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-330M 275
Pentium Gold 7505 1348
+390%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 390% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i3-330M 576
Pentium Gold 7505 2598
+351%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 351% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-330M 2330
Pentium Gold 7505 6773
+191%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 191% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-330M 5491
Pentium Gold 7505 14093
+157%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 157% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-330M 2230
Pentium Gold 7505 4890
+119%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 119% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-330M 23.95
Pentium Gold 7505 14.48
+65.4%

Core i3-330M outperforms Pentium Gold 7505 by 65% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-330M 2
Pentium Gold 7505 4
+156%

Pentium Gold 7505 outperforms Core i3-330M by 156% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 3.36
Recency 7 January 2010 17 October 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium Gold 7505 has a 409.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium Gold 7505 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330M and Pentium Gold 7505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330M
Core i3-330M
Intel Pentium Gold 7505
Pentium Gold 7505

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 291 vote

Rate Core i3-330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3527 votes

Rate Pentium Gold 7505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330M or Pentium Gold 7505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.