i5-520E vs i3-330M
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2745 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Core i5 |
Power efficiency | 1.75 | no data |
Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Westmere (2010−2011) |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $210 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | DMI 1.0 |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 1 × 2.5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 16 | 18 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA | no data |
Number of transistors | 382 million | 382 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | BGA1288,PGA988 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | 17.051 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | Intel HD Graphics |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330M and Core i5-520E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.