i5-10400F vs i3-330E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.36
+932%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i3-330E by a whopping 932% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2606915
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.01
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.1511.95
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$177$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR4
Maximum memory size8.79 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330E 0.81
i5-10400F 8.36
+932%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-330E 1260
i5-10400F 13029
+934%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 8.36
Recency 7 January 2010 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i3-330E has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has a 932.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-330E is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330E and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13530 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330E or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.