FX-4300 vs i3-3245

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3245
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.49
FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88
+26.2%

FX-4300 outperforms Core i3-3245 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21451973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.561.87
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3245 and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3245 and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3245 and FX-4300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3245 and FX-4300.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3245 1.49
FX-4300 1.88
+26.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3245 2373
FX-4300 2982
+25.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3245 518
+14.1%
FX-4300 454

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3245 1177
+6.6%
FX-4300 1104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.88
Recency 1 April 2013 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 95 Watt

i3-3245 has an age advantage of 5 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

FX-4300, on the other hand, has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

The FX-4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3245 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3245 and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3245
Core i3-3245
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate Core i3-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1732 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3245 or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.