FX-9800P vs i3-3240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.49
FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.63
+9.4%

FX-9800P outperforms Core i3-3240 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21622089
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.5210.09
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size94 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FP4
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3240 1.49
FX-9800P 1.63
+9.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3240 2321
FX-9800P 2543
+9.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3240 547
+10.3%
FX-9800P 496

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3240 1119
FX-9800P 1119

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.63
Integrated graphics card 0.69 1.95
Recency 3 September 2012 31 May 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

i3-3240 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9800P, on the other hand, has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score, 182.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P.

Note that Core i3-3240 is a desktop processor while FX-9800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240 and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1216 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240 or FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.