Pentium 6805 vs i3-3217UE

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3217UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.86
Pentium 6805
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.80
+226%

Pentium 6805 outperforms Core i3-3217UE by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25551681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency4.7717.59
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Ice Lake-Y (2020)
Release date1 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size118 mm2123 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1023FCBGA1526
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3217UE 0.86
Pentium 6805 2.80
+226%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3217UE 1362
Pentium 6805 4424
+225%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 2.80
Recency 1 August 2012 1 October 2020
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium 6805 has a 225.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 6805 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3217UE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 6805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3217UE
Core i3-3217UE
Intel Pentium 6805
Pentium 6805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3217UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 190 votes

Rate Pentium 6805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3217UE or Pentium 6805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.