Core i7-13650HX vs Core i3-2365M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2365M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
Core i7-13650HX
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
20.49
+3766%

i7-13650HX outperforms i3-2365M by a whopping 3766% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2749250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-HX
Release date27 June 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$319 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1964
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel® UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2365M 0.53
i7-13650HX 20.49
+3766%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 3766% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-2365M 822
i7-13650HX 31685
+3755%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 3755% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-2365M 1826
i7-13650HX 10616
+481%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 481% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-2365M 4044
i7-13650HX 68755
+1600%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 1600% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-2365M 1659
i7-13650HX 16051
+868%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 868% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-2365M 1
i7-13650HX 37
+2694%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 2694% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-2365M 0.56
i7-13650HX 3.31
+491%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 491% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2365M 0.1
i7-13650HX 16.7
+12746%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 12746% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-2365M 1437
i7-13650HX 8422
+486%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i3-2365M by 486% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 20.49
Recency 27 June 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 55 Watt

The Core i7-13650HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2365M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2365M and Core i7-13650HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2365M
Core i3-2365M
Intel Core i7-13650HX
Core i7-13650HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate Core i3-2365M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 428 votes

Rate Core i7-13650HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2365M or Core i7-13650HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.