Solo T1350 vs i3-2357M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2357M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.50
+317%
Core Solo T1350
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.12

Core i3-2357M outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28973359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Core Solo
Power efficiency2.780.42
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 June 2011 (13 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size149 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors624 million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.262V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2357M 0.50
+317%
Solo T1350 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2357M 788
+306%
Solo T1350 194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.12
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 31 Watt

i3-2357M has a 316.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 82.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-2357M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2357M and Core Solo T1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2357M
Core i3-2357M
Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 12 votes

Rate Core i3-2357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2357M or Core Solo T1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.