Athlon II X4 641 vs i3-2350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-2310M Core i3-2330M Core i3-2350M Core i5-2410M Core i5-2430M Core i5-2450M Core i5-2520M Core i5-2540M Core i7-2630QM Core i7-2640M Core i7-2670QM Pentium B960
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4-3300 A4-3400 A6-3500 A6-3600 A6-3650 A8-3800 A8-3850 A8-3870K Athlon II X4 631 Athlon II X4 641 Athlon II X4 651 E2-3200

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2350M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.82
Athlon II X4 641
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.51
+84.1%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Core i3-2350M by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

i3-2350M i3-2350M
Athlon II X4 641 Athlon II X4 641

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26062162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.141.38
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2011 (13 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)no data
Number of transistors624 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2350M 0.82
Athlon II X4 641 1.51
+84.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2350M 1255
Athlon II X4 641 2313
+84.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-2350M 338
Athlon II X4 641 374
+10.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-2350M 669
Athlon II X4 641 1256
+87.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.82 1.51
Recency 1 October 2011 6 February 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

i3-2350M has 185.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X4 641, on the other hand, has a 84.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2350M is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2350M and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-2350M
Core i3-2350M
AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-2350M Core i3 2350M
vs
A6-9210 A6 9210
Athlon II X4 641 Athlon II X4 641
vs
i3-3240 Core i3 3240
i3-2350M Core i3 2350M
vs
Celeron 3765U Celeron 3765U
i3-6006U Core i3 6006U
vs
Pentium E6500 Pentium E6500
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+
vs
i9-13900K Core i9 13900K
FX-4130 FX 4130
vs
Ryzen 9 3950X Ryzen 9 3950X
FX-4130 FX 4130
vs
Ryzen 5 3400G Ryzen 5 3400G
FX-4130 FX 4130
vs
i3-10100 Core i3 10100
i3-2350M Core i3 2350M
vs
Athlon II X3 445 Athlon II X3 445
Athlon X2 7750 BE Athlon X2 7750 BE
vs
Phenom II X4 910e Phenom II X4 910e
Core 2 Duo T7700 Core 2 Duo T7700
vs
Solo T1200 Core Solo T1200
i5-2400 Core i5 2400
vs
Celeron 540 Celeron 540
Celeron G3920 Celeron G3920
vs
Ryzen 7 4700U Ryzen 7 4700U

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 532 votes

Rate Core i3-2350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 145 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2350M or Athlon II X4 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.