FX-6130 vs i3-2330E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2330E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.15
FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.75
+139%

FX-6130 outperforms Core i3-2330E by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23701690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency3.102.73
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2011 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache128 KB288 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2330E and FX-6130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2330E and FX-6130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2330E and FX-6130 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2330E and FX-6130.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2330E 1.15
FX-6130 2.75
+139%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2330E 1823
FX-6130 4353
+139%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 2.75
Recency 1 June 2011 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

i3-2330E has 171.4% lower power consumption.

FX-6130, on the other hand, has a 139.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The FX-6130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2330E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2330E is a notebook processor while FX-6130 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2330E and FX-6130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2330E
Core i3-2330E
AMD FX-6130
FX-6130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i3-2330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2330E or FX-6130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.