Pentium P6300 vs i3-2310M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2310M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
+45.3%
Pentium P6300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Core i3-2310M outperforms Pentium P6300 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26352858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Pentium
Power efficiency2.081.43
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)9 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier2117
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)90 °C
Number of transistors624 million384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2310M 0.77
+45.3%
Pentium P6300 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2310M 1220
+46.3%
Pentium P6300 834

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.53
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.77
Threads 4 2

i3-2310M has a 45.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Pentium P6300, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU.

The Core i3-2310M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310M and Pentium P6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2310M
Core i3-2310M
Intel Pentium P6300
Pentium P6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 572 votes

Rate Core i3-2310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Pentium P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2310M or Pentium P6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.