Athlon 64 FX-55 vs i3-2310M

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2630not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$180

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size149 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistors624 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988939
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2310M 1222
+202%
Athlon 64 FX-55 404

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 10 October 2004
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 104 Watt

i3-2310M has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 197.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-2310M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-55 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310M and Athlon 64 FX-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2310M
Core i3-2310M
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 570 votes

Rate Core i3-2310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2310M or Athlon 64 FX-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.