EPYC 7573X vs i3-2102

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2102
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.28
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.71
+3315%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Core i3-2102 by a whopping 3315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking229550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.8614.77
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan-X (2022)
Release date1 June 2011 (13 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size131 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2102 1.28
EPYC 7573X 43.71
+3315%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2102 2029
EPYC 7573X 69432
+3322%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 43.71
Recency 1 June 2011 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

i3-2102 has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has a 3314.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2102 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-2102 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2102 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2102
Core i3-2102
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-2102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2102 or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.