Ryzen 3 8440U vs i3-13100F

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-13100F
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 58 Watt
9.21
+14.3%
Ryzen 3 8440U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
8.06

Core i3-13100F outperforms Ryzen 3 8440U by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking828927
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency15.0327.24
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FP7
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2014

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-13100F 9.21
+14.3%
Ryzen 3 8440U 8.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-13100F 14626
+14.2%
Ryzen 3 8440U 12805

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.21 8.06
Recency 4 January 2023 6 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 28 Watt

i3-13100F has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 3 8440U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 107.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-13100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 8440U in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-13100F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 8440U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-13100F and Ryzen 3 8440U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-13100F
Core i3-13100F
AMD Ryzen 3 8440U
Ryzen 3 8440U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 853 votes

Rate Core i3-13100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 8440U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-13100F or Ryzen 3 8440U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.