Ryzen Threadripper 1998 vs i3-10105F
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1132 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 56 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 8.24 | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $97 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | no data |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 32768 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 0 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
Ryzen Threadripper 1998 has 300% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Ryzen Threadripper 1998, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.