Embedded G-Series T16R vs Ultra 9 285K

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Embedded G-Series
Power efficiency32.79no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Bobcat
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz0.62 GHz
Bus rate250 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm40 nm
Die size243 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million451 Million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardno data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data8.53 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUAMD Radeon HD 6250

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 3 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 4 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Embedded G-Series T16R, on the other hand, has 3025% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Embedded G-Series T16R is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Embedded G-Series T16R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Embedded G-Series T16R
Embedded G-Series T16R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 111 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Embedded G-Series T16R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Embedded G-Series T16R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.