Ultra 5 245K vs Ultra 9 285K

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.31
+57.5%
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.50

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core Ultra 5 245K by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.9073.71
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency32.7920.82
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245K has 4% better value for money than Ultra 9 285K.

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2414
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate250 MHz159 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket18511851
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285K 43.31
+57.5%
Ultra 5 245K 27.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285K 68800
+57.5%
Ultra 5 245K 43682

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285K 25963
+46.2%
Ultra 5 245K 17760

Blender(-)

Ultra 9 285K 79
Ultra 5 245K 136
+72.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285K 2388
+7.4%
Ultra 5 245K 2224

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285K 7366
+13.7%
Ultra 5 245K 6477

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285K 129706
+66.5%
Ultra 5 245K 77921

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 9 285K 387
+11.8%
Ultra 5 245K 346

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.31 27.50
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 24 14

Ultra 9 285K has a 57.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 245K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 111 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.