Ryzen 9 3900 vs Ultra 9 285H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
23.31
+21.6%
Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
19.17

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen 9 3900 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking231313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.29
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency49.3028.07
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release dateno data24 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads1624
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB64 MB
Chip lithographyno data7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data2x 74 mm2
Number of transistorsno data7,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes2824
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 23.31
+21.6%
Ryzen 9 3900 19.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 37343
+21.6%
Ryzen 9 3900 30713

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.31 19.17
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 16 24
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 21.6% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 285H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 633 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 9 3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.